The Savage Mind (La pensée sauvage, 1962) is one of the most influential texts of French structuralism and marks an important bridge between ethnology, sociology, and cultural studies. In this work, Claude Lévi-Strauss challenges the conventional distinction between „primitive“ and „civilized“ thought. Using numerous ethnographic examples, he demonstrates that so-called „savage“ patterns of thought—in myths, rituals, or classification systems—follow their own internal logic that is structurally equivalent to scientific rationality. For sociology, the work opens up fundamental perspectives on analyzing symbolic order, cultural logics, and collective knowledge.
Academic and Historical Context
The work emerged during a period of intense theoretical change in the French humanities and social sciences. Originally trained as an ethnologist, Lévi-Strauss developed his structuralist perspective following linguistic models from Ferdinand de Saussure. In The Savage Mind, he offers a critique of Enlightenment-era evolutionist assumptions that depicted Indigenous or premodern societies as „underdeveloped.“ Instead, he argues that all societies possess highly differentiated systems of understanding the world. The text was widely received not only in anthropology but also in sociology, philosophy, and cultural theory.
Key Points
The Savage Mind by Claude Lévi-Strauss
Main Author: Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908–2009)
First Published: 1962
Country: France
Core Idea: Mythical and so-called „primitive“ thought follows its own structured logic. It is not irrational but organized differently from modern science.
Foundation for: Structuralist cultural and knowledge sociology, discourse analysis (Foucault), symbolic theory (Douglas), Bourdieu (field and classification theory)
Central Question
The central question of the work is: How do people think in different cultural contexts, and what structures underlie this thinking? Lévi-Strauss is interested in the universal patterns of symbolic order: How do people classify animals, plants, colors, or kinship relations? And what do these classifications reveal about the relationship between nature, culture, and society?
Main Theses and Theoretical Concepts
Structuralism as Method
Structuralism is a theoretical approach that assumes social, cultural, and linguistic phenomena cannot be understood in isolation but as part of deeper underlying systems. These systems are made up of structures that often operate unconsciously but shape human thought, perception, and action.
Lévi-Strauss applied this linguistic-inspired approach (from Ferdinand de Saussure) to anthropology and cultural theory. He is considered one of the key pioneers of cultural structuralism. He argues that human thinking everywhere operates according to fundamental patterns, such as binary oppositions like raw/cooked, nature/culture, male/female.
These underlying structures of symbolic order manifest in myths, rituals, classifications, kinship systems, and language. The task of science is to decode these deep structural patterns—comparable to analyzing the grammar that enables speech without conscious awareness.
In this sense, Lévi-Strauss is not the „inventor“ but the critical pioneer of structuralism in the social sciences. He profoundly influenced the French intellectual landscape of the 1960s and 1970s and laid the groundwork for post-structuralist approaches (e.g., Foucault, Derrida).
What Is Structuralism?
Structuralism is a theoretical approach that argues phenomena like language, culture, or thought rest on deep underlying structures. These structures are typically built on binary oppositions (e.g., raw/cooked, male/female, nature/culture) through which people organize their world and create meaning.
- Origin: Linguistics (Ferdinand de Saussure), later applied to anthropology, literature, sociology
- Central Assumption: Meaning emerges not in isolation but through relations within a system
- Individual: Not the main agent but a bearer of cultural rules and structures
- Goal: To uncover unconscious patterns of symbolic order
Claude Lévi-Strauss is regarded as one of the most important representatives of structuralism in the social sciences. His analyses show how deeply rooted patterns of thought shape cultural action—regardless of the specific form of society.
Unlike action- or interaction-oriented theories in sociology (e.g., Weber or Goffman), structuralism focuses on the symbolic orders that unconsciously shape thought and culture. The following table outlines key differences:
| Aspect | Structuralism | Action-Oriented Theories | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject of analysis | Symbolic orders and classification systems | Individual action and interpretation | ||
| Analytical focus | Underlying structures and binary oppositions (e.g. raw/cooked, nature/culture) | Subjective meanings, motives and social interaction | ||
| View of the individual | Carrier of cultural rules and structures | Active interpreter and meaning-giver | ||
| Methodological approach | Analysis of unconscious cultural patterns and systems | Reconstruction of subjective meaning and social interaction | ||
| Research interest | Universal structures of symbolic ordering | Context-dependent action and interpretation processes | ||
| Example | Claude Lévi-Strauss' analysis of myths and kinship systems | Max Weber's concept of meaningful social action or Erving Goffman's dramaturgical analysis |
Comparison: Structuralism and Action-Oriented Theories
„Savage“ and „Scientific“ Thought
At its core, the book rehabilitates what Lévi-Strauss calls „savage thought“ (*pensée sauvage*). This refers to a concrete, classificatory form of thinking closely tied to the sensory, material world. It is not irrational but works according to different principles than abstract, formalized science. Lévi-Strauss argues that both forms of thought are structurally comparable—they simply differ in their modes of expression.
„Savage“ and „Scientific“ Thought
Claude Lévi-Strauss distinguishes between two forms of human understanding:
- Savage Thought: Concrete, classificatory, closely tied to the sensory world; uses myths, symbols, analogies, and practical experience.
- Scientific Thought: Abstract, theoretical, formalized; based on logic, experimentation, and systematic knowledge production.
Both follow structural rules—neither is superior to the other. „Savage thought“ is a creative and structured form of symbolic world interpretation.
Bricolage (Constructing Meaning with What Is at Hand)
A central image for „savage thought“ is the bricoleur—the tinkerer who works with whatever materials are available. Unlike the engineer, who designs new means for a specific problem, the bricoleur recombines existing symbols, meanings, and objects to interpret or solve a situation. This portrays cultural action as a creative but structured engagement with meaning.
Bricolage – Working with What Is at Hand
Lévi-Strauss uses the term bricolage to describe a specific form of cultural thinking and action: „constructing with what is at hand.“ Unlike the engineer’s planned, systematic approach, the bricoleur improvises, repurposing existing symbols, objects, or meanings to solve immediate problems or generate meaning.
This principle applies not only to premodern societies but also to modern cultural and symbolic practices. A striking example is the safety pin: originally an everyday, practical object symbolizing order, security, and utility, it was recontextualized in punk subculture as body jewelry, protest symbol, and aesthetic rupture. The function remains formally the same, but the cultural meaning is radically transformed through new use.
Such forms of bricolage reveal that cultural meanings are never fixed but constantly recombined, reinterpreted, and revalued—a central theme of structuralist cultural theory.
Relevance for Sociology
Although Lévi-Strauss was not formally a sociologist, The Savage Mind is foundational for the study of symbolic order in sociology. His work is closely tied to cultural sociology, sociology of knowledge, and classification studies. His structuralist approach later influenced Michel Foucault (discourse analysis), Pierre Bourdieu (field and habitus), and Mary Douglas (purity and danger). Lévi-Strauss demonstrates that social order is anchored not only institutionally or economically but also symbolically and culturally.
Critique and Reception
The work was both celebrated and controversial. Critics particularly faulted its ahistorical approach: Lévi-Strauss’s structures appear timeless and cross-cultural, thereby pushing social dynamics, power relations, and historical change to the background. Postcolonial and feminist theories also criticized structuralism for speaking about other cultures from a supposedly neutral observer position. Nevertheless, The Savage Mind remains a milestone in theoretical development—and a key text for understanding cultural logic beyond Western rationality.
Relevance for Current Debates
Today, Lévi-Strauss’s thinking is enjoying renewed relevance—in the anthropology of knowledge, debates about alternative epistemologies, or the recognition of Indigenous knowledge systems. In sociology, there is growing interest in symbolic classification, cultural scripts, and non-Western modes of understanding. The work helps question Eurocentric perspectives and better appreciate the diversity of human systems of meaning-making.
Conclusion
With The Savage Mind, Claude Lévi-Strauss offers a theoretically demanding and provocative work. He breaks with dismissive views of premodern cultures and opens up new ways of seeing the equality of different modes of thought. For sociology, the book is significant in that it directs attention to cultural structures that shape our relationship with the world as profoundly as institutions or power relations. Lévi-Strauss’s contribution remains an essential impulse for anyone engaging with the symbolic dimension of social order.
References
- Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1966). The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. [First English translation of La pensée sauvage (1962).]
- Culler, Jonathan (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge. [Provides an accessible introduction to structuralism with sections on Lévi-Strauss.]
- Leach, Edmund (1970). Lévi-Strauss. New York: Viking Press. [A classic anthropological commentary on Lévi-Strauss’s methods and assumptions.]
- Inglis, Fred (2000). Claude Lévi-Strauss. London: Routledge. [Part of the Routledge Critical Thinkers series – a helpful primer on Lévi-Strauss’s life and thought.]
- Wiseman, Boris (2007). Lévi-Strauss, Anthropology and Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Explores structuralism and symbolic thought, including aesthetic dimensions of *The Savage Mind*.]
- Eribon, Didier (1991). Michel Foucault. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Includes comparative reflections on structuralism and its influence on Foucault.]
- Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. [Offers a critical yet appreciative reading of Lévi-Strauss’s structuralism in contrast to interpretive anthropology.]
- Ortner, Sherry B. (1984). „Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties.“ In Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), pp. 126–166. [Engages critically with structuralism’s legacy and influence on later anthropological theory.]
.jpg){kind=link}