Thinking About CrimeActs or omissions that violate criminal laws and are punishable by the state., published in 2004 by American criminologist Michael Tonry, offers a scathing critique of punitive crime control policies in the United States. Building on decades of policy analysis and empirical research, Tonry dismantles the assumptions underpinning the “tough on crime” agenda and argues for a more rational, evidence-based approach to criminal justice. The book is both a policy intervention and a theoretical reflection on the relationship between politics, public opinion, and criminal justice reform.
Key Points
Thinking About Crime by Michael Tonry
Main Author: Michael Tonry (b. 1945)
First Published: 2004
Country: USA
Key Idea: Tonry criticizes the rise of punitive crime policies in the U.S. and advocates for evidence-based criminal justice grounded in fairness, proportionality, and social justice.
Foundation for: Debates on sentencing reform, mass incarceration, and the role of political rhetoric in criminal justice. Tonry’s arguments intersect with David Garland and Jonathan Simon in their critique of late modern penal governance.
Core Arguments
1. The Failure of “Tough on Crime”
Tonry argues that the dominant punitive turn in American criminal policy—marked by mandatory minimum sentences, three-strikes laws, and the war on drugs—has produced massive social harm without demonstrable benefits. These policies have not reduced crime in a meaningful or cost-effective way, and instead have disproportionately impacted marginalized communities, especially African Americans and the poor.
2. Politics and Populism Over Evidence
One of the central themes in Thinking About Crime is the disconnect between criminological evidence and policymaking. Tonry highlights how political leaders, particularly in the U.S., have prioritized symbolic gestures and public fear over rational analysis. In doing so, they have ignored decades of research pointing to the limited utility of harsh punishments in preventing crime.
3. Injustice and Disproportionality
Tonry emphasizes the moral and practical consequences of disproportional sentencing practices. The shift towards retributive justice, driven by political imperatives rather than moral reasoning, has led to an erosion of fairness and proportionality—core principles of a just legal system. He warns that ignoring these principles undermines public trust and democratic legitimacy.
4. Social Context of Crime
Crime cannot be understood in isolation from its social context. Tonry insists that socioeconomic inequality, structural racism, poor education, and unemployment are key drivers of crime. Effective crime control policies must therefore address these root causes instead of focusing narrowly on individual deterrence or incapacitation.
Theoretical Significance
Tonry’s work is grounded in a realist tradition that values empirical data and policy relevance, yet it is deeply critical of neoliberal and populist trends in penal governance. While not a formal theorist in the traditional sociological sense, Tonry’s arguments have shaped critical criminology and penal reform debates alike. He provides a normative framework for understanding the ethical foundations of criminal justice policy and urges scholars and policymakers to align practice with principle.
Connections to Other Theories and Works
- Critical CriminologyA perspective that examines power, inequality, and social justice in understanding crime and the criminal justice system.: Tonry’s critique of mass incarceration resonates with scholars like Nils Christie and Angela Y. Davis, who similarly condemn the punitive drift in criminal policy.
- Governing Through Crime: Tonry’s insights align closely with Jonathan Simon’s concept of the “governing through crime” paradigm, where crime control becomes a vehicle for broader social regulation.
- The CultureThe shared symbols, beliefs, values, and practices of a group or society. of Control: Like David Garland, Tonry emphasizes the cultural, political, and institutional dynamics that sustain harsh penal policies despite their ineffectiveness.
References
- Tonry, M. (2004). Thinking About Crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Simon, J. (2007). Governing Through Crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Christie, N. (1993). Crime Control as Industry. London: Routledge.
- Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.


