Sociology & Criminology for a Changing World
Goffman’s Perspective: From Visible Deviance to Social Exclusion In Stigma, Erving Goffman explores the mechanisms by which societies mark individuals whose appearance, behavior, or background is considered deviant from social norms. A stigma is not an inherent attribute, but rather a social judgment that is ascribed to a person. Physical stigmas (e.g., visible disabilities) Character-related
Theories in this category—often referred to as developmental theories—share the assumption that crime is best understood as a processual phenomenon, not as isolated acts. They introduce the variable of time as a crucial dimension for understanding why people become involved in crime, why they persist, and why they desist. Developmental perspectives emphasize that criminal behavior
Control theories focus on explaining why people do not commit crime, in contrast to approaches that seek to explain why people offend. They begin with the assumption that most individuals are naturally motivated to pursue their own interests, which can include deviant or criminal acts, if left unchecked. The central question for control theorists is
Crime is a form of meaningful social action that can only be understood by situating it within its cultural, emotional, and interactional contexts. Both offending and the social reaction to it are shaped by contested symbolic frameworks and affective dynamics. Theories within this category approach crime as a culturally and emotionally meaningful form of social
Critical, Marxist and Conflict theories in criminology offer a fundamental critique of traditional crime theories that focus on individual pathology or socialisation failures. Instead of asking why individuals offend in isolation, these perspectives explore how definitions of crime, mechanisms of control, and punishment practices are shaped by social inequalities, power structures, and historical conflicts. They
Interactionist and labelling approaches constitute a paradigm shift in criminological theory. Rather than explaining crime as the outcome of static individual pathologies or deterministic social factors, these perspectives emphasise the social construction of deviance through processes of interaction, attribution, and power. Crime, in this view, is not a self-evident act but an outcome of societal