Sociology & Criminology for a Changing World
Techniques of Neutralization explain how offenders justify or rationalize their deviant behavior, allowing them to violate social norms while maintaining a self-image as essentially moral individuals. Key Points Techniques of Neutralization Main Proponents: Gresham M. Sykes, David Matza First Publication: 1957–1958 Country of Origin: United States Core Idea: Offenders use learned techniques to neutralize guilt
Theory of Differential Opportunities combines insights from learning, subcultural, anomie, and social disorganization theories to explain why not everyone exposed to strain or blocked opportunities turns to crime. It emphasizes that access to illegitimate means varies and shapes the pathways into criminal behavior. Key Points Differential Opportunity Theory Main Proponents: Richard A. Cloward and Lloyd
Subcultural theory, developed by Albert K. Cohen in the 1950s, explains juvenile delinquency as a collective response to status frustration in a class-stratified society. It argues that marginalized youth form subcultures with alternative norms and values that reject those of mainstream society. These subcultures provide an alternative system of status and recognition, often encouraging deviant
Travis Hirschi’s Social Bonds Theory (1969) is one of the most influential control theories in criminology. Rather than asking why people commit crime, Hirschi asks why they conform to rules at all. He argues that human beings have a natural tendency toward deviance, and that conformity results from effective social control rooted in strong social
Delinquency and Drift by David Matza (1964) represents a landmark critique of both positivist criminology (e.g., Lombroso) and contemporary theories of juvenile delinquency like Cloward & Ohlin’s differential opportunity theory and Cohen’s subcultural theory. Matza challenges the behavioral determinism in these approaches and argues instead for a nuanced, interactionist understanding of delinquency as a temporary,
What is the Multiple Factor Approach? The Multiple Factor Approach represents an early and influential attempt to move beyond one-sided, monocausal explanations of crime. It posits that no single factor alone can account for delinquency; rather, crime results from the complex interplay of multiple social, psychological, and biological factors. This perspective rejects simplistic theories of