• Zur Hauptnavigation springen
  • Zum Inhalt springen
  • Zur Fußzeile springen

SozTheo

Sociology & Criminology for a Changing World

  • Sociology
    • Theories
    • Key Works in Sociology
    • Key Concepts in Sociology
  • Criminology
    • Key Works in Criminology
    • Key Concepts in Criminology
  • Theories of Crime
    • Classical and Rational Choice Theories of Crime
    • Biological Theories of Crime
    • Social Structure & Anomie
    • Learning and Career
    • Interactionist & Labeling
    • Critical, Marxist & Conflict Theories
    • Control Theories
    • Cultural & Emotional
    • Space & Surveillance
  • Key Thinkers
  • Glossary
Home » Glossary » Symbolic Interactionism

Symbolic Interactionism

Symbolic interactionism is a sociological perspective that explains human behavior and social reality through social interaction, communication, and the interpretation of symbols and meanings.

Explanation

Symbolic interactionism is a sociological perspective that focuses on how people create, negotiate, and interpret meanings through everyday social interaction. Rather than viewing society as determined solely by structures or institutions, symbolic interactionism emphasizes the active role of individuals in constructing social reality.

The approach emerged primarily from the work of George Herbert Mead and was later systematized by Herbert Blumer, who coined the term “symbolic interactionism.”

According to Blumer, symbolic interactionism rests on three central assumptions:

  • people act toward things based on the meanings those things have for them,
  • meanings arise through social interaction,
  • and meanings are continuously interpreted and modified through social processes.

Symbols — such as language, gestures, clothing, or social labels — play a crucial role because they allow individuals to communicate shared meanings and develop social identities.

In criminology, symbolic interactionism strongly influenced:

  • Labeling Theory,
  • studies of deviant identities,
  • research on stigma and social reactions,
  • interactionist criminology,
  • and ethnographic approaches to crime and deviance.

Interactionist criminologists argue that deviance is not simply an objective property of behavior but emerges through processes of social definition, labeling, and negotiation.

Theoretical Reference

Symbolic interactionism is associated with George Herbert Mead, Herbert Blumer, Erving Goffman, labeling theory, ethnomethodology, and interactionist sociology.

Related Terms

  • Labeling Theory
  • Stigma
  • Identity
  • Social Construction
  • Deviance
  • Socialization

Footer

About SozTheo

SozTheo is a personal academic project by Prof. Dr. Christian Wickert.

The content does not reflect the official views or curricula of HSPV NRW.

SozTheo.com offers clear, accessible introductions to sociology and criminology. Covering key theories, classic works, and essential concepts, it is designed for students, educators, and anyone curious about social science and crime. Discover easy-to-understand explanations and critical perspectives on the social world.

Looking for the German version? Visit soztheo.de

Legal

  • Impressum

Explore

  • Sociology
    • Key Works in Sociology
    • Key Concepts in Sociology
  • Criminology
    • Key Works in Criminology
    • Key Concepts in Criminology
  • Theories of Crime
  • Key Thinkers
  • Glossary

Meta

  • Anmelden
  • Feed der Einträge
  • Kommentar-Feed
  • WordPress.org

© 2026 · SozTheo · Admin